<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>The Footnote — Citehall</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/</link><description>One letter a month for working adults in online programs: one practical method, one deadline trap, one thing worth knowing before your term does it to you.</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>An appendix that earns its place</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/an-appendix-that-earns-its-place/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/an-appendix-that-earns-its-place/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Samuel Adebayo</dc:creator><description>Appendices are where unread material goes to inflate a document. What belongs there is anything a reader would need to check your work, and nothing else.</description></item><item><title>Building a search string that works</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/building-a-search-string-that-works/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/building-a-search-string-that-works/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Marisol Quintanilla</dc:creator><description>A search built from your claim rather than your title, using the words the literature uses, assembled so it can be widened, narrowed and run again months later.</description></item><item><title>Citing a clinical guideline</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/citing-a-clinical-guideline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/citing-a-clinical-guideline/</guid><dc:creator>Hannah Wickstrom</dc:creator><description>Guidelines are cited wrongly more often than any other source type, usually to the wrong author entirely, and the version you downloaded may already be superseded.</description></item><item><title>Grey literature, and when it counts</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/grey-literature-and-when-it-counts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/grey-literature-and-when-it-counts/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Thandiwe Mokoena</dc:creator><description>Reports, standards and registry data are not peer-reviewed and are frequently the right citation. What decides it is the job you are asking the source to do.</description></item><item><title>How old is too old for a citation</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/how-old-is-too-old-for-a-citation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/how-old-is-too-old-for-a-citation/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Sigrid Nyholm</dc:creator><description>The five-year rule is a shorthand for something more useful: whether anything has changed since, which depends entirely on what the source is being asked to do.</description></item><item><title>Levels of evidence explained</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/levels-of-evidence-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/levels-of-evidence-explained/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Sigrid Nyholm</dc:creator><description>Evidence hierarchies rank designs by how well they answer one kind of question, which is why the top of the pyramid is sometimes the wrong place to look.</description></item><item><title>Paraphrase or patchwriting</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/paraphrase-versus-patchwriting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/paraphrase-versus-patchwriting/</guid><dc:creator>Clara Fairbairn</dc:creator><description>One question separates a real paraphrase from a source with its words swapped, and the method producing the first is faster than the method producing the second.</description></item><item><title>Primary or secondary sources</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/primary-versus-secondary-sources/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/primary-versus-secondary-sources/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Sigrid Nyholm</dc:creator><description>The difference matters less than the question of what each can support, and a rubric asking for primary sources is usually asking for something quite specific.</description></item><item><title>Quoting a source you found inside another</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/quoting-a-source-you-found-inside-another/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/quoting-a-source-you-found-inside-another/</guid><dc:creator>Clara Fairbairn</dc:creator><description>Secondary citation is permitted in every style and it advertises that you did not read the original. Here is when it is acceptable and how to avoid needing it.</description></item><item><title>Reading a forest plot</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/reading-a-forest-plot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/reading-a-forest-plot/</guid><dc:creator>Warren Cobbett</dc:creator><description>The diamond at the bottom is the least interesting part. What tells you whether to trust a meta-analysis is the spread above it and the line down the middle.</description></item><item><title>Reading a methods section</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/reading-a-methods-section/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/reading-a-methods-section/</guid><dc:creator>Warren Cobbett</dc:creator><description>Six things to check in a methods section, in the order that tells you fastest whether a study can support the claim you want to attach to it.</description></item><item><title>Retracted papers, and how to check</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/retracted-papers-and-how-to-check/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/retracted-papers-and-how-to-check/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Sigrid Nyholm</dc:creator><description>Retracted work keeps circulating for years after withdrawal. Checking takes under a minute per source and it is the one citation error a marker never forgives.</description></item><item><title>Saving a search so it runs again</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/saving-a-search-so-it-runs-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/saving-a-search-so-it-runs-again/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Marisol Quintanilla</dc:creator><description>A documented search can be re-run when a committee asks what is new, translated to another database, and pasted into a methods section. It takes seconds to record.</description></item><item><title>The reference a marker always checks</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/the-reference-a-marker-always-checks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/the-reference-a-marker-always-checks/</guid><dc:creator>Clara Fairbairn</dc:creator><description>Markers do not verify whole lists. They check two or three, chosen predictably, and what they find decides how carefully they read everything else.</description></item><item><title>The table that replaces three paragraphs</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/the-table-that-replaces-three-paragraphs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/the-table-that-replaces-three-paragraphs/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Samuel Adebayo</dc:creator><description>Some comparisons are unreadable as prose and obvious as a table. Knowing which is which saves words, improves comprehension and is usually worth marks.</description></item><item><title>What a confidence interval actually says</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/what-a-confidence-interval-actually-says/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/what-a-confidence-interval-actually-says/</guid><dc:creator>Warren Cobbett</dc:creator><description>The interval carries more usable information than the p value beside it, and reading it properly changes how you describe a finding in your own writing.</description></item><item><title>What makes a source citable</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/what-makes-a-source-citable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/what-makes-a-source-citable/</guid><dc:creator>Clara Fairbairn</dc:creator><description>Four checks deciding whether something belongs in a reference list, applied in the order that fails fastest, so a bad source costs you a minute rather than a draft.</description></item><item><title>What peer review does not guarantee</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/what-peer-review-does-not-guarantee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/what-peer-review-does-not-guarantee/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Sigrid Nyholm</dc:creator><description>Peer review checks that a study is reportable, not that it is right. Knowing what it does and does not do changes how much weight a citation can carry.</description></item><item><title>When a DOI does not resolve</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/when-a-doi-does-not-resolve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/when-a-doi-does-not-resolve/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Marisol Quintanilla</dc:creator><description>A digital object identifier leading nowhere means one of four things. Telling them apart takes a minute and decides whether that source stays in your list.</description></item><item><title>Why your library proxy matters</title><link>https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/why-your-library-proxy-matters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.citehall.com/newsletter/why-your-library-proxy-matters/</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Marisol Quintanilla</dc:creator><description>Half of what students believe is paywalled is available through their own library, and the difference is usually a route rather than a subscription.</description></item></channel></rss>